county Heard: Last News

Marilyn Manson - Johnny Depp - Amber Heard - Marilyn Manson used racial slur against The Smashing Pumpkins’ James Iha in text message to Johnny Depp - nme.com - Virginia - county Heard - county Fairfax
nme.com
86%
329
Marilyn Manson used racial slur against The Smashing Pumpkins’ James Iha in text message to Johnny Depp
Marilyn Manson used a racial slur against The Smashing Pumpkins’ James Iha during a text message conversation with Johnny Depp.The conversation happened in 2016 after Lindsay Usich (Manson’s current wife) allegedly “filed a police report” against Manson.The text accuses Usich of “pulling an Amber (Heard)” by getting the police involved but, according to Manson, it was only because her brother-in-law James Iha and her “poor, fat Mom want to steal my money”. It’s here Manson uses a racial slur targeted at people of East Asian descent.According to the texts, Depp then offers Manson a place to “hide out”, if he needs it.More text messages between Marilyn Manson and Johnny Depp pic.twitter.com/T02Mh1rrqU— kamilla (@k4mil1aa) July 31, 2022Thousands of pages of documents filed in Johnny Depp and Amber Heard’s defamation case were unsealed at the end of last month, with Depp supporters paying over $3,300 (£2700) to access the files.At the start of June, the jury in the Johnny Depp and Amber Heard trial gave their verdict, ruling in favour of Depp.The verdict was returned after almost 13 hours of deliberation across three days at the district court in Fairfax, Virginia.Depp has been awarded $10million (£8million) in compensatory damages and $5million in punitive damages.
Two women hospitalised after van driver's sneezing fit caused massive car crash - dailystar.co.uk - Jordan - county Heard
dailystar.co.uk
86%
960
Two women hospitalised after van driver's sneezing fit caused massive car crash
caused a crash that left two women needing hospital treatment told police that he had suffered a sneezing fit due to hay fever in the moments before the collision.Alexander Harkness crashed his Peugeot van into two cars and left a motorway blocked at rush hour.The 29-year-old was travelling on Edinburgh's City Bypass when he careered into the back of vehicles at speed.The Daily Record reports that two women in one of the smashed cars were taken to hospital for treatment after the collision.Harkness, who suffers from hay fever, told police he started sneezing moments before the high-speed impacts.He appeared at the city’s sheriff court on Wednesday and admitted driving without due care and consideration.Fiscal depute Gillian Koren said traffic on the bypass had been “slow moving” and “heavy”, but “free-flowing” sections allowed vehicles to reach 25mph to 30mph.Ms Koren said it was 4.45pm when a Hyundai SUV driven by Maxine Alexander with passenger Jacqueline Hardy travelled westbound from Sheriffhall Roundabout.A Hyundai car was being driven behind it by Jordan Brazendale, the court heard, and Harkness followed that in his work van.Ms Koren said Maxine and Jordan became aware of slow moving traffic ahead and slowed to 15mph.To stay up to date with all the latest news, make sure you sign up to one of our newsletters here.Jordan looked in his rear-view mirror, she said, and saw the van “driving towards him at high speed”.The court heard Jordan didn’t have “time to take evasive action and braced for impact” while there was “no evidence” of emergency braking by Harkness.The van struck the Hyundai car, forcing it to mount the central reservation and leave the carriageway.Ms Koren said Harkness’ Peugeot then collided with
Johnny Depp - Amber Heard - Camille Vasquez - Camille Vasquez says Johnny Depp appealed verdict because Amber Heard did - nypost.com - Washington - Virginia - county Heard - county Fairfax
nypost.com
65%
397
Camille Vasquez says Johnny Depp appealed verdict because Amber Heard did
the $2 million verdict awarded to Amber Heard in the couple’s defamation battle.Vasquez told “CBS Mornings” co-host Gayle King it was “fair” to say that Depp’s team wouldn’t be seeking to appeal if his ex-wife hadn’t first filed to challenge the jury verdict ordering her to pay Depp $10 million in damages.Depp filed his notice of appeal Friday seeking to overturn the single count of defamation that Heard won at their bombshell trial last month. His filing came one day after Heard filed her own appeal.The 59-year-old “Pirates of the Caribbean” actor is hoping that the appeal will nullify the $2 million award the jury handed Heard over her claims that Depp’s lawyer made false and damaging comments about her.Depp, of course, came out victorious last month when a Fairfax County, Va., jury found that Heard defamed him in a 2018 Washington Post op-ed piece on being a victim of domestic abuse.Vasquez said Heard’s appeal was “expected.”“I mean, she’s indicated since the day she lost the trial that she was going to appeal,” the lawyer at Brown Rudnick said. Filing their own appeal is an effort “to protect our client’s interest,” Vasquez said, referring to Depp.She also told King she felt “lucky” to represent the star accused of domestic abuse. Johnny Depp’s lawyer, Camille Vasquez, tells @gayleking that their relatively young legal team was an asset in his case: “I think young people have a fresh perspective on especially these issues, the issues that we were discussing in this case — abuse, Me Too.” pic.twitter.com/dmg0TnlNZ1EXCLUSIVE: @GayleKing sits down with attorney Camille Vasquez, who represented Johnny Depp in his defamation trial win against ex-wife Amber Heard, for her first interview since Heard filed a motion to
Johnny Depp - Amber Heard - Jack Sparrow - Elaine Bredehoft - Amber Heard wants new Johnny Depp trial and is 'seeking appeal' to overturn verdict - dailystar.co.uk - Washington - county Heard - county Fairfax
dailystar.co.uk
77%
620
Amber Heard wants new Johnny Depp trial and is 'seeking appeal' to overturn verdict
Amber Heard is asking Fairfax County Circuit Court judge to waive the recent verdict of the defamation case brought against her by Johnny Depp.Lawyers for Aquaman actress recently filed a 43-page document, arguing that the outcome of the trial, more than $10 million (£8.2 million) was not supported by evidence.They argued against Johnny's claims that the 59-year-old reportedly lost his job on Pirates of the Caribbean, due to claims made by Heard in a 2018 opinion piece for the Washington Post.READ MORE: Johnny Depp's Jack Sparrow pictures reinstated at Disneyland after court caseAmber, 36, documented her experience with domestic abuse – Johnny's name was not mentioned in the article but his lawyers argued it "falsely implied" she was a victim of abuse during their marriage.Her legal team asked the court to put the verdict which was in favour of Johnny aside, dismiss the complaint or call for a new trial.Amber's legal team also claim that just one of three statements was found to be defamatory and the article wasn't written by Heard, she simply retweeted it on Twitter the day after it was published.In a court document signed by Elaine Bredehoft, a lawyer for Amber, Johnny allegedly "proceeded solely on a defamation by implication theory, abandoning any claims that Ms Heard's statements were actually false."While Depp's later Ben Chew argued "what we expected, just longer, no more substantive."Heard's lawyers also asked whether one member of the jury served properly on the trial, arguing that Juror 15 had a 25-year difference in their age on the court documents and documents that are publicly available.They argued that Juror 15 was listed as being born in 1945 but "was clearly born later than 1945.
prince Harry - Meghan Markle - Piers Morgan - prince Andrew - Johnny Depp - Amber Heard - 'It's disgusting' Piers Morgan slams Prince Harry's 'terrible' decision to call out royals - express - county Heard
express.co.uk
46%
659
'It's disgusting' Piers Morgan slams Prince Harry's 'terrible' decision to call out royals
He explained he felt “annoyed” by Harry. Piers then added he was unimpressed by Harry’s potential decision to “spray-gun the Royals”. He prefaced by describing Meghan as “highly manipulative” and “ruthless” but adding that Harry’s behaviour was just as frustrating. The star said: “You’re dealing with a really ruthless person here, highly manipulative, very determined to springboard herself up the social ladder…“But really, I feel as annoyed by Harry’s behaviour, if not more so actually. “I think what he’s doing is terrible. “The fact he keeps doing it, and he’s got this book coming out, which is presumably going to spray-gun the royals all over again, I think it’s disgusting.”He then went on to discuss the scandals involving Prince Harry and Meghan Markle in comparison to Prince Andrew.Speaking to The Times in April he confirmed he obviously thought what Andrew is accused of was “far worse.” He explained there is no scale to compare the two scandals. The presenter said the fact that The Queen’s second son has had to “pay millions of dollars in a settlement to stop himself being accountable in a court of law against a woman claiming that he had under-age sex with her in America is disgusting”. That was far from the first time Piers got involved with a public spat, however. A Twitter argument he once had with Amber Heard in 2019 was recently uncovered. It follows after Piers has hit out at Amber over her remarks about losing her defamation trial against ex-husband Johnny Depp.The original exchange took place when Piers went after razor company Gillette for their “the best a man can be” campaign, where they encouraged men to stop saying “boys will be boys”.Gillette said that the expression “excuses bad behaviour”. Piers
DMCA