Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s permanent return to UK is very ‘possible’

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are reportedly getting a UK PR professional onboard to repair their image back home. Rumour has it they're on the lookout for ways to polish up their tarnished image amidst an ongoing fallout with the Royal Family.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry might be planning to return to the Royal Family part-time, an expert has claimed. Before they left The Firm, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex had hoped to continue in a similar vein, but the late Queen Elizabeth II is said to have told her grandson it was "in or out," with no room for "half jobs".

It's only been two days since Gary Goldsmith entered the Celebrity Big Brother house, and he has already shared some insight on the Royal Family. However, the businessman, who is the uncle of Princess Of Wales Kate Middleton, caused some controversy during Wednesday's (6 March) show, when he discussed Meghan Markle and Prince Harry.

Meghan Markle is reported to be joining Prince Harry on his next UK visit after he announced he would be returning to London more often following King Charles' cancer diagnosis.

A Royal expert has suggested that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle could potentially make a permanent return to the UK and the Royal Family.

Paul Burrell, the former butler to Princess Diana and footman to the late Queen Elizabeth II, has taken another swing at Prince Harry.The 65 year old's latest dig comes amid the recent verdict following Harry's legal battle with the Home Office. Back in February 2020, the Duke of Sussex took legal action after the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (Ravec) decided he should receive a downgraded level of protection when visiting the UK.

lost his bid for taxpayer-funded UK security protection for his family and will now have to pay out of pocket for his family’s security when visiting the UK.Court documents have revealed that Harry even asked for the identity of who demoted the level of his personal protection on home soil.“I would like that person’s name,” Harry said, according to the 52-page ruling published Wednesday.Sir Peter Lane, the judge of the High Court in London, ruled that there was no unlawfulness in the initial decision to strip the Sussexes of their security.Harry could now potentially be made to foot a large bill to reimburse taxpayers’ legal costs after he was unable to prove that he had been treated “unfairly.”The exiled royal argued that he was not given the “same degree” of protection after quitting royal life, and even compared his situation to the dangers his late mother, Princess Diana, faced before her tragic death in 1997.Harry told a hearing that security concerns were preventing him from visiting his home turf.However, Judge Lane said that “there is no merit in this contention.”“The UK is my home. The UK is central to the heritage of my children,” Harry last year told the court in a written statement read out by his lawyers.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were involved in what was described as a "near catastrophic" car chase last May after attending the Woman of Vision Awards. The couple were tailed by paparazzi for hours according to reports.

One royal expert believes that King Charles made a "big mistake" when he evicted his son Prince Harry and Meghan Markle from Frogmore Cottage and reportedly offered it to Prince Andrew.

Good Morning Britain presenter Kate Garraway once pointed out an inaccuracy in a statement from the Duke and Duchess of Sussex which announced the christening of their daughter Lilibet.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle may slowly turn back to part-time royal life, following their shock departure from officialduties in 2020.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have reportedly been in 'talks' to discuss an action plan moving forward if their efforts to fix the ongoing feud with the royals falls through.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have had to 'pay up' for their new website as they work on changing their brand. The Duke and Duchess wanted to start fresh and use their Sussex title but to do this, they had to give money to the person who owned the rights to the Sussex.com website. They paid the owner "without argument", writes The Mirror.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry may not be on the same page when it comes to their future plans.

Prince Harryand Meghan Markle’s relaunched website and use of their official coat of arms could be telltale signs of an “internal conflict”, according to a royal expert. Last week, the couple replaced their Archewell website with Sussex.com, and included a notable change in logo from a calligraphed H&M to the couple’s coat of arms, which was designed for their wedding and approved by the late Queen Elizabeth II in 2018.

Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle reportedly bought the domain for their controversial new Sussex website from a British tech businessman Neil Agate, The Sun has reported. According to the outlet, Agate, born in Sussex but currently resides in the US, registered the domain in 1995 and held on to it for almost 30 years until it was purchased by Prince Harry, 39, and Markle, 42, for an undisclosed amount.

The Prince of Wales believes his brother Prince Harry and sister-in-law Meghan Markle "cannot be trusted", it has been claimed by a source close to Prince William.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle aware they have "went too far" with their attacks on the Royal Family and seem to be looking for "some sort of reconciliation", according to a PR expert.

visited the training camp for the 2025 Invictus Games in British Columbia on Wednesday.Their rep told the Mirror on Thursday: “We’ve heard time and time again that certain opportunities are make or break for the couple. They’re still here.”“They’re still working and pursuing what they believe in, despite constantly being challenged and criticized.

to Page Six.“The reality behind the new site is very simple — it’s a hub for the work the Sussexes do and it reflects the fact the family have, since the King’s coronation, the same surname for the first time,” an insider told The Times.“That’s a big deal for any family.