Emmerdale fans ‘rumble’ true identity of necklace thief after death tragedy
29.08.2023 - 20:31
/ ok.co.uk
Emmerdale fans were convinced foul play was afoot on Tuesday’s visit to the village, when former thief Victor Anderson was accused of stealing Manpreet’s necklace. As regular viewers will know, Manpreet and Jai Sharma were warring over the precious family heirloom in the wake of Rishi’s death - with Manpreet finally having agreed to return the item to Jai after sleeping on it.
However, when she went to return the item it was found to be missing, and later was discovered in Victor’s pocket, just months after he was released from prison on probation after serving time for theft. Immediately, Manpreet and Jai presumed the worst and later phoned the police to report the theft, but fans at home weren’t convinced Victor could be the culprit, with many fans pointing the finger at Victor’s son Charles Anderson instead.
The mild mannered vicar had been keen to force Victor from his life in recent weeks after discovering his mother Claudette was slowly getting closer to him again, but after his attempts to urge him to leave fell on deaf ears, fans are convinced that he could have resorted to more severe methods to remove him from their lives and once and for all.
“Oh Charles, I think you have some explaining to do.
Then again I think it's time Victor slinged his hook, with his manipulated ways,” wrote one fan. A second agreed adding: “I don't know if Victor has been set up or not, but I'd have set him up just to get rid of him.” Before a third fan commented: “I wouldn't put it past him to steal any damn thing but it looks helluva careless of Victor not to have hidden Manpreet's necklace better...maybe Charles is framing Victor to get shot of him.” Meanwhile a fourth fan echoed the sentiment as they suggested: “Charles fitting his
.
The website popstar.one is an aggregator of news from open sources. The source is indicated at the beginning and at the end of the announcement. You can
send a complaint on the news if you find it unreliable.