The schizophrenia of ‘levelling up’
06.02.2022 - 10:41
/ manchestereveningnews.co.uk
It was among the Victorian heritage of Manchester’s Museum of Science and Industry, two and a half years ago, that Boris Johnson first made the pitch.
Days after first entering Number 10, the Prime Minister had travelled 200 miles north, to promise precious hope to communities that had watched their industries and civic pride erode, their power diminish and their children’s prospects dwindle.
He would, he said, ‘level’ them up.
What did it mean? According to his former adviser, Dominic Cummings, there was no thought behind it. Yet for the PM, a man disinterested in policy but - back then, at least - formidable on campaigning, it became a catch-all pitch to people from Bury to Bishop Auckland, whose votes he needed to win. And he did.
READ MORE: 'They should spend it on this s***hole': Levelling up fund leaves Greater Manchester town with more questions than answers
What it meant afterwards remained unanswered and in that vacuum, the term ‘levelling up’ has since become all things to all people (apart from the large percentage of the public who haven’t heard of it).
For the PM it has become a slogan to shield behind in any storm; for think-tanks, PR firms and lobbyists it has become a veritable industry. For those who have been arguing for years that government should be taking sustained action to close regional divides, it must mean nothing less than a rewiring of the British state.
But there was no official explanation as to what the government thought it meant, or how it would be achieved, until this week.
Michael Gove’s resulting plan is a long way from the primary-colour picture Boris Johnson painted two years ago.
His very long levelling up white paper is padded out with a treatise about Renaissance Florence and