Bridgerton stars share the reason series two has less raunchy sex scenes
22.03.2022 - 14:03
/ ok.co.uk
Bridgerton’s writer and central stars have revealed the reasons behind the decision to feature less sex scenes in the much-anticipated second series of the show. When the first series of the show hit the streaming site, fans went wild for the raunchy love scenes between Regé-Jean Page and Phoebe Dynevor’s two main characters, the Duke of Hastings and Daphne Bridgerton.
However, many of the first reviews of the Netflix super hit have pointed out that the follow-up series, which centres on a love triangle, has far less than its predecessor - with no sex scenes until the final two episodes. Get exclusive celebrity stories and fabulous photoshoots straight to your inbox with OK!'s daily newsletter Now, Jonathan Bailey, who takes centre stage as Anthony Bridgerton, and his co-star Simone Ashley, who has joined the cast as his love interest Kate Sharma, have broken their silence on this and shared the reasons behind the decision.
Speaking to OK! and other press outlets at the launch of the show, Jonathan, 33, explained: “I think what’s achieved - which is also a nod to the future - in how people fall in love in so many different ways and connect with their own bodies and intimacy. “Kate and Anthony feel naked in front of each other and I think that’s a very interesting way of exploring that innate sexuality.
I think it bodes well for the following seasons - to not just be expected for it to be about the sex. “That is a huge part of it, but there’s so many other amazing things that are explored and will be explored going forward.” 26 year old Simone, who also stars as Olivia in another Netflix hit Sex Education, added: “It makes sense for these character because they’re so protective of their families and they’re so truthful to
.
The website popstar.one is an aggregator of news from open sources. The source is indicated at the beginning and at the end of the announcement. You can
send a complaint on the news if you find it unreliable.