Queer Eye Makeover Recipients Defend Jonathan Van Ness From 'Monster' Allegations!
07.03.2024 - 20:01
/ perezhilton.com
Queer Eye‘s “hometown heroes” are standing up for Jonathan Van Ness!
A bombshell report from Rolling Stone this week revealed nasty allegations about the hairstylist. One source from the set of the Netflix reality series claimed the beauty guru had “rage issues” and would have frequent outbursts that scared everyone. Others called the non-binary reality star a “monster,” a “nightmare,” and “demeaning.” The Getting Curious podcaster, who uses they/he/she pronouns, also allegedly didn’t want to “share the spotlight with anyone,” making it challenging to film the series.
While JVN and the other members of the Fab Five have yet to speak out, several makeover recipients are now hitting back at the accusations!
Related: Teen Mom‘s Tyler Baltierra Threatening Catelynn Lowell With Divorce?!
While speaking to TMZ on Thursday, Cory Waldrop (middle right inset), who was on the first season, said he wasn’t aware of the latest allegations but believed Jonathan acted the same on-camera as they did behind the scenes. Cory recalled how JVN went out of his way to treat him like the star of the show, even letting him cut the line at the production’s food truck during taping. Not the behavior of a “monster”!
William Mahnken from Season 2 (middle left inset) felt similarly, and insisted he had no issues with the Over the Top author during filming nor did he see the Gay of Thrones host do anything negative on set. William also had lots of fond memories of his time with JVN, including the fact the celeb promised to take him to the Emmys if their mom couldn’t make it. Wow!
A more recent star, Michael Richard II of Season 7 (top inset), insisted the 36-year-old was “always bright and nice” while making the show — and he didn’t witness any
The website popstar.one is an aggregator of news from open sources. The source is indicated at the beginning and at the end of the announcement. You can
send a complaint on the news if you find it unreliable.