Love Island's Jess Hayes shares reason why loads of winning couples break up
16.07.2022 - 17:41
/ ok.co.uk
Love Island's first winner Jess Hayes has revealed that there's a reason so many winning couples don't make it long term after leaving the villa.The reality star, now 29, won the first series of Love Island in 2015 with partner Max Morley, however the couple split just a few months after leaving the villa. Following the news that last year's winners Millie Court and Liam Reardon have split, Jess has shared the reasons she thinks many couples don't keep their relationship going for very long following the end of the show.
She shared that making public appearances following the show can sometimes alter the dynamics of couples' relationships – something she thinks may have happened to Millie and Liam. Jess shared: “I feel like you're so young when you go in there.
And, I'm not gonna lie, the boys just want to be boys. “I'm not saying that girls are any different, but the boys want to go out and do their thing.
"They’ll go to loads of PAs [public appearances], tours of nightclubs, and go together with the other boys while girls are throwing themselves at them. It gives you major anxiety, and the trust wasn't there for me.” Speaking to The Sun, she added that the couple's come under a lot of pressure to perform their relationship for fans on social media.
She added: "The pressure of keeping everyone up to date with your relationship must be so hard, that feeling like you need to update social media. “It's just so much pressure all the time - especially as you feel like because you've won, you've got to prove to people that they voted for the right people and that you're together.” However, despite Millie and Liam's split, some Love Island couples have had their relationships blossom into long term loves, including Molly-Mae
.
The website popstar.one is an aggregator of news from open sources. The source is indicated at the beginning and at the end of the announcement. You can
send a complaint on the news if you find it unreliable.