Love Island's eagle-eyed viewers spot editing blunder as Tanya's outfit changes
23.02.2023 - 03:23
/ ok.co.uk
Love Island viewers spotted an editing blunder seemingly revealing that Tanya Manhenga's outfit had changed within seconds on the ITV2 reality show. The scene left eagle-eyed fans puzzled as they noticed that 22 year old model Tanya was wearing a black skin-tight body-con dress in one scene.
Seconds later, she was seen swapping into a double denim outfit instead. What's more, the islander had even changed hairstyles as she wore her brunette locks loose around her shoulders during a chat with Shaq.The star was then sporting a low ponytail while speaking to the girls in the closet room.
As the episode progressed, Tanya was then seen in her black dress once more, and the confusion appeared to be solved by a simple editing faux pas mixing up two separate nights. But others were also puzzled why it looked like Tanya was getting ready for a night out in her denim ensemble when the rest of the girls were getting ready to go to bed in their pyjamas.
"Can someone explain why at the end of the night debrief Tanya was wearing a full denim jumpsuit? Was this clip from a different night?" one person queried. Another fan posted: "When it showed you the girls going to bed Tanya had that double denim set on, but it was meant to be her getting ready to go out and sleep outside with Shaq?" "Editing poor mate...Tanya was wearing that denim outfit about 20 minutes ago in the programme lol," a third laughed.
While a fourth wondered: "Wait, why was Tanya wearing that denim jumpsuit? Did the producers mess up?" The scenes came as Tanya and Shaq Muhammad rekindled their romance on the dating show, leaving bombshell Martin Akinola disappointed and annoyed with his Casa Amor coupling. But while the drama continues to unfold between the trio,
.
The website popstar.one is an aggregator of news from open sources. The source is indicated at the beginning and at the end of the announcement. You can
send a complaint on the news if you find it unreliable.