'Frustrated' Chloe Madeley 'won't be reuniting' with James after latest blow
12.12.2023 - 07:11
/ ok.co.uk
After persistent speculation surrounding their relationship, Chloe Madeley and James Haskell finally confirmed their split in October. But almost two months later, 38-year-old James has reportedly “frustrated” Chloe by allegedly accusing paparazzi of “ending his marriage”.
The former rugby player was looking a little worse for wear as he left London hotspot Chiltern Firehouse, where it’s thought he addressed the breakdown of his marriage to photographers.
Although things might appear amicable between the former couple now, James’ latest comments are said to have hurt 36-year-old fitness trainer Chloe, according to a source. “Blaming the photographers came as another blow for Chloe and she found it very frustrating,” they exclusively told new.
“He might have gone a step too far this time.” Chloe and James were in the midst of filming their fly-on-the-wall TV show, Chloe Madeley: A Family Affair, when the rumour mill went into overdrive about the state of their marriage. James was first snapped talking to a mystery blonde and then he and Chloe were later spotted without their wedding rings on.
Two months ago, the pair released a joint statement to confirm they were no longer together, which referenced that they had “mutually” decided to separate and that they would continue to “co-parent” their 16-month-old daughter Bodhi.
Chloe later said on Instagram that splitting from her husband contributed to the “hardest summer” of her life. However, this latest “public” message from James apparently doesn’t come as a surprise to Chloe, who has told fans numerous times there’s no chance of them reuniting.
“She wishes he would take some ownership of their split, but sadly she knows that will never be the case,” a source said. “It’s
.
The website popstar.one is an aggregator of news from open sources. The source is indicated at the beginning and at the end of the announcement. You can
send a complaint on the news if you find it unreliable.