Prince Harry's "significant tensions" with royals as he sues UK Home Office

Prince Harry "wouldn’t have married Meghan Markle" if Princess Diana was alive, The Queen’s former aide has strongly claimed. In an exclusive interview with GB News on Friday 22 July, The Queen’s former Press Secretary Dickie Arbiter also hit out at the BBC as pressure grows on them to apologise for the Martin Bashir scandal.

Prince Harry can now take the British government to court over his security arrangements, a judge in London ruled.  When Harry and wife Meghan Markle gave up their status as senior royals and moved to California in 2020, they lost publicly funded U.K. police protection.  The Duke of Sussex now wants to pay for his own police security for when he visits his family in Britain and is challenging the government’s refusal to allow it. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle asked to pay for their own security, and the government denied their request.

Prince Harry is now allowed to take the British government to court over his security arrangements in the U.K., a judge in London ruled Friday.

Prince Harry has won the latest stage of his High Court fight against the Home Office over his security arrangements. The Duke of Sussex began a legal challenge against the Home Office in February, after it refused to allow him to pay for his own protection while visiting the UK.

Prince Harry has won a bid to bring part of his High Court claim against the Home Office over his security arrangements while in the UK. Harry, 37, is taking legal action over a decision not to allow him to pay for police protection for himself and his family – wife Meghan Markle and their two young children – when visiting from their home in California.

Spilling the royal tea. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle‘s life in the royal spotlight is dissected in Tom Bower‘s new book, Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the War Between the Windsors.

Prince William and Harry’s ex-nanny is set to receive substantial damages from the BBC over "false and malicious” allegations used to obtain Martin Bashir’s Panorama interview with Princess Diana in 1995. Tiggy Legge-Bourke appeared at the High Court in London for a public apology from the broadcaster regarding “fabricated” allegations that she had had an affair with the Prince of Wales while working as Charles’ personal assistant in 1995.

Following Prince Harry‘s keynote speech at the United Nations, royal expert Jonathan Sacerdoti weighed in on why he believes the royal’s appearance didn’t seem appropriate.

Prince Harry delivered a keynote speech on Nelson Mandela International Day, in which he referred to his wife Meghan Markle as his "soulmate." On Monday, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex arrived in New York City, where the British royal gave a special address to the United Nations.The couple held hands as they entered the building and Markle, 40, wore a pinky ring signifying women's empowerment, People magazine reported. After New York City Mayor Eric Adams spoke, Harry addressed the assembly.

Meghan Markle after she berated them for their “jokes about sexism, feminism and transgender people,” a new book claims.The Duke of Sussex invited Markle, then his girlfriend, to meet his friends during a shooting weekend at the royal family’s Sandringham country estate in 2016 for “endless banter, jokes — and a lot of drinking,” according to “Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the War between the Windsors,” excerpts of which were obtained by the Sun.The group at Sandringham included 16 of Harry’s pals, as well as their wives and girlfriends. But Markle did not enjoy the comedy among the friends, according to the book, written by British journalist Tom Bower.“Without hesitation, Meghan challenged every guest whose conversation contravened her values,” the book claims.

Meghan Markle‘s excitement about gracing the cover of Vanity Fair for its October 2017 issue dissipated almost immediately after it hit newsstands, sparking outrage and disdain from the actress and the royal family.

A leading investigative journalist has claimed Prince Harry chose to ignore "the warnings that Meghan [Markle] spelled trouble".Tom Bower has suggested that the Duke of Sussex, 37, had decided to ignore the fact Meghan, 40, had spoken to journalist Sam Kashner for Vanity Fair in 2017 about their relationship. At the time their engagement was still a secret to the world and her decision to speak to the press came after Harry had "ordered" her to "maintain a tight-lipped silence about sensitive subjects". Mr Bower makes the claims in his upcoming book, Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the war between the Windsors.

Meghan Markle's excitement about gracing the cover of Vanity Fair for its October 2017 issue dissipated almost immediately after it hit newsstands, sparking outrage and disdain from the actress and the royal family.This tale is part of royal biographer Tom Bower's new book,, and in excerpts published by, the British author explains that Markle was given explicit instructions on what she could and could not mention for the high-profile story.Bower, a prominent investigative journalist in the UK, claims the Duchess of Sussex was given strict orders to steer away from several sensitive subjects: Donald Trump, race and her relationship with Prince Harry. In fact, Bower claims it was Harry's public relations team that insisted Harry not be mentioned in the interview. The interview, instead, was to focus on Meghan's philanthropy and the celebration of the 100th episode of her hit USA show.

There are new details about tensions between Prince Harry and the royal staff.

Prince William might still be giving Prince Harry the cold shoulder, but their father, Prince Charles, was willing to put aside their drama for a day to meet his new granddaughter!

Prince William and Kate Middleton still have some trust issues when it comes to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, over a year after their tell-all TV interview with Oprah Winfrey.Nicholl points out that the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge did not meet with Meghan and Harry when they were in the United Kingdom, though the couple did reconnect with other members of the royal family during their visit.«I think that does signal not just a busy timetable on the part of the Cambridges but perhaps also a bit of a lack of trust,» she tells ET. «I do know that William and Kate are worried that anything they might say or do with the fact that it could end up being leaked to the media.