Stacey Solomon 'can't get my head around' financial support for Royal family
29.09.2022 - 19:25
/ ok.co.uk
Stacey Solomon has addressed comments she made about the Royal Family after clips resurfaced online following the death of the Queen. In a debate on a 2018 episode of Loose Women, on which Stacey is a panellist, the 32 year old mum of four said that she "'doesn't get the obsession" with the royals and questioned why we "pay a contribution towards them".
After the clip reared its head in the aftermath of the late Queen's death on 8 September, Stacey explained her comments to The Guardian, she said it was hard to see them resurface during the period of mourning for the late monarch. Stacey said: "I have nothing against the monarchy and the Queen seemed like a lovely lady, but I don't understand why we pay a contribution to one of the wealthiest families in the world." She continued: "Some of our kids weren't even getting school lunches, and to know a huge amount of money is going to somebody who doesn't need it, I just couldn't get my head around that.
"I don't know why they can't exist just as a cool famous family. Why do they have to be head of anything and have that monetary contribution?" During the original debate on Loose Women, a clip of which was shared on TikTok, Stacey said: "'I don't get why we're so obsessed with these humans that are exactly the same," after the conversation had centred on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.
She went on: "I'm probably gonna be of the opinion of nobody else in the entire world but I just don't get it [the Royal Family]. I don't get any of it." Gesturing to the rest of the Loose Women panel, which included Jane Moore, Linda Robson and Christine Lampard, she continued: 'Like, it could be us four sitting there.' Jane added: "For me, they're becoming celebrities," as Stacey quickly
.
The website popstar.one is an aggregator of news from open sources. The source is indicated at the beginning and at the end of the announcement. You can
send a complaint on the news if you find it unreliable.