Charles and Harry 'had private conversation' about royal titles for Archie and Lilibet

Prince Harry’s surprise return to the UK had ‘stunt written all over it’, a royal expert said. The Duke of Sussex’s attendance at London’s High Court was a “sure-fire way” to ensure his case against Associated Newspapers got “serious publicity”, commentator Daniela Elser added.

The Duke of Sussex has made a surprise return to the UK for the first time since the late Queen’s funeral – but is not expected to meet with his father King Charles or his brother, Prince William. Prince Harry's trip – for a High Court hearing in London in his claim against Daily Mail publisher Associated Newspapers over allegations of unlawful information-gathering – will be seen as demonstrating the strength of his determination over the legal action.

Prince Harry made a surprise visit to London today and fans were shocked to see him outside of a UK courthouse.

The jury is still well and truly out on whether or not Prince Harry and Meghan Markle will be at King Charles' Coronation on May 6.

Leaving Archie and Lilibet out of his coronation plans could spell trouble for King Charles in the future, an expert has claimed.The coronation of the new monarch is fast approaching and is expected to draw the world’s elite to Westminster Abbey for the historic event. Last week, the coronation plans were revealed, though Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s kids were notably absent following the series of scathing remarks the Sussex’s launched at the royal family in their Harry & Meghan Netflix documentary and the Duke’s memoir, Spare.The gap between Harry and the rest of the family seems bigger than ever, which could be why his kids were not included in the plans.

“more inclusive” coronation on May 6.The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are “worried that it will be too much for” the 9-year-old, according to royal commentator Tom Quinn.The “Gilded Youth: A History of Growing Up in the Royal Family” author gave his hot take to the UK’s Express on Sunday, alleging that “there is a bit of an argument going on about whether George should play a more formal role” in the official crowning of King Charles, 74.Quinn claimed that William, 40, and Middleton, 41, are anxious over George’s role, hoping that it won’t paint a negative picture of the child in the eyes of the public.The writer also noted that the pair are uneasy about George’s role because they feel like their son could still be too young to take on a more royal duties.“It’s almost an echo of the way William and [Prince] Harry were sometimes made to attend formal occasions that they shouldn’t have been made to attend,” Quinn said, referencing how William and his younger brother, 38, undertook many royal engagements in their younger years.One of the most famous events that a teen William and an adolescent Harry were forced to endure was the 1997 funeral for their mother Princess Diana.The brothers were seen walking behind her coffin alongside the rest of the royal family.“A lot of people criticized that and said that it was a horrible thing to make two boys that young, and especially Harry, do,” Quinn said.He continued: “So I think people are remembering this and thinking, ‘Well hang on a minute, if George is some sort of a pageboy, or has a similar role at the coronation, is that going back too far towards the traditional roles?'”“There is a debate going on quite fiercely at the moment about how to do that.

Prince Harry declined to respond to an invite to take part in a debate about the future of royal reporting at a media freedom conference, the panel’s moderator has claimed. Associate editor at The Telegraph Camilla Tominey opened a discussion at the Society of Editors’ Media Freedom Conference in London on Wednesday 15 March, by telling the audience that the Duke of Sussex did not respond to a request for participation.The panel, which also included royal editors from the Daily Mirror and The Sunday Times, discussed a number of criticisms Harry made about the media in his tell-all book, Spare.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle surprised palace aides with their "highly ironic" decision to give their two children royal titles this week, an expert told Fox News Digital.  "It appears that with one decisive stroke, she and Harry declared that their children would be prince and princess, basically making the king's decision for him," Christopher Andersen, author of the "The King: The Life of Charles III," said a day after the couple first referred to their daughter as Princess Lilibet in her christening announcement.   The celebration for the 21-month-old was confirmed Wednesday.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have labelled Lilibet’s princess title a “birthright” in a new statement - and we want to know what YOU think. It comes after the couple announced the christening of their one-year-old daughter on Wednesday, in a statement that called her the royal style.This marked the first time she has been publicly called a princess and confirms that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will use royal titles for their children.The royal family’s official website has also been changed to reflect that the children will use the titles prince and princess.

A prince and princess. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s kids, son Archie, 3, and 21-month-old daughter Lilibet, are now using their official royal titles.

For the first time, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have publicly used the royal titles, Prince and Princess for their children, Archie, three, and Lilibet, one. It comes after the couple’s daughter - Lili for short - was christened in Los Angeles on Friday.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are officially the parents of a prince and princess. As of today, the royal family's website has updated their line of succession to include Prince Archie of Sussex and Princess Lilibet of Sussex, listed right after their father. "The children's titles have been a birthright since their grandfather became monarch.This matter has been settled for some time in alignment with Buckingham Palace," a spokesperson for the Sussexes confirmed to Fox News Digital.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s children Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet’s updated titles have been added to the royal family’s official website.

The Royal Family has made Archie and Lilibet’s new titles official with an update to its website. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle publicly referred to their daughter as Princess Lilibet Diana for the first time this week as they announced their 21 month old daughter had been christened at their home in Montecito, California.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have said they believe their children's royal titles, Lilibet and Archie, are a "birthright" in a recently released statement.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are in negotiations with the Palace over their attendance at King Charles III’s coronation providing their son Archie’s fourth birthday celebrations are factored into the mix, we can reveal.The Sussexes are currently in the midst of negotiating several elements of their attendance at May's coronation providing their place is secured on the Buckingham Palace balcony, their security is adequately covered, and, most importantly for the couple, their son Archie’s birthday is recognised. A source told OK! that Harry and Meghan are said to be keen to attend the coronation as it is a key milestone for the family and one they wouldn’t want their children to miss.

Prince William, Kate Middleton, King Charles and Camila, Queen Consort, all opted not to attend the christening of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's daughter, Lilibet, despite being invited to the private ceremony.A spokesperson for Harry and Meghan confirmed to ET that an intimate ceremony was held last week at their home in Montecito, California, for the couple's 21-month-old daughter. «I can confirm that Princess Lilibet Diana was christened on Friday, March 3, by the Archbishop of Los Angeles, the Rev. John Taylor,» the spokesperson shared.According to, the ceremony was attended by 20-30 guests including Lilibet's godfather, Tyler Perry, an unnamed godmother and Meghan's mother, Doria Ragland.Although the royals were not in attendance, ET can confirm that Lilibet’s title of princess is in line with the precedent created by the letters patent issued by George V in 1917, which conferred the title of prince or princess on male line grandchildren of the Sovereign, meaning she and her brother, Archie, 3, have been able to hold the titles since Charles' accession.The royal family's absence comes after months of turmoil between Harry, Meghan, William and Charles, following the release of Harry's memoir,.

The King is said to have been told about Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's intention to use royal titles for their children before it became public knowledge. Lilibet, who is one, and three-year-old Archie weren't given HRH titles at birth.

An official upgrade. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle‘s children, Archie and Lilibet, will have their titles altered on the royal family’s website, Us Weekly can confirm.

with the royal family (and pretty much everyone Windsor adjacent), and have decided to refer to their children by the royal titles they inherited after the death of the late Queen Elizabeth II. The couple publicly referred to their daughter Lilibet as “Princess Lilibet” for the first time while announcing her christening, which took place in a private ceremony last Friday at the Duke and Duchess's home in Montecito, California.“I can confirm that Princess Lilibet Diana was christened on Friday, March 3 by the Archbishop of Los Angeles, the Rev John Taylor," a spokesperson told . According to a source, Meghan and Harry extended invitations to King Charles III, , Prince William, and Kate Middleton to attend, but none showed.